• Fleppensteyn@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Associating with arbitrary groups, such as football fans, nationalists, wearing certain clothing brands

  • squirrel_bear@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Being poor or lower middle class and voting for right wing/conservatives. You essentially give away your hard earned money and give it to ultra rich and worsen the quality of your life… usually because the right wing scares people to be afraid of other people and new phenomena.

  • SeverianWolf@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    People who litter. Throw their rubbish out the window of the car. Or who throw rubbish in public, like into drains or sidewalks.

    It’s in the mentality, and I say the lack of education is the reason for it.

    It’s sad to see the people of my country do this, and to see it with your own eyes.

  • pH3ra@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Whataboutism”, or if you are unfamiliar with the term:

    “The act or practice of responding to an accusation of wrongdoing by claiming that an offense committed by another is similar or worse”

    People that use this mechanism are “poorly educated” and unable to hold a conversation and they should just be mocked by whatabouting even harder, so they can maybe understand that they’re dumb and that’s not how you should debate.

    Example of the last argument I had recently with my dumb c*nt father:

    • Me: You shouldn’t idolize that politician, he evaded literally billions in taxes and that befalls on citizens like you
    • Dumb c*nt father: Yeah? And what about that other politician?
    • Me: What about the disappearing middle class?!
    • D.C.F.: What…?
    • Me: WHAT ABOUT THE BEES!?!
  • atlasraven31@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Not being able to entertain ideas. “What would the world be like with 100% renewable energy?” “Would basic healthcare for every person help our country?”

    I tried to explain the 4 day work week to someone that gets paid by the hour. You make the same money but work 4 days a week instead of 5. Insisted he got paid less. Had to explain like a Bingo card with a Free Space, 1 day he is paid even if he stays home.

  • NutWrench@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    MAGA Hats. Those people are dumb by choice. And that’s less forgivable than people who just don’t know any better.

  • Antik@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Being a republican. Sure there are some educated grifters who decide to label themselves as republican, but your average republican voter is a mouth-breathing fucking idiot.

  • Jode@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I see this in a lot of places I do work:

    Toolboxes covered in union stickers, AND Trump stickers…

  • Valbrandur@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Thinking about different languages in the terms of “useful” or “useless” according to the number of speakers they have.

    Edit: What I mean specifically is not for someone to want or not to personally learn a language, but if the existance in itself of a language is more or less valuable according to how many people speak it (per example and as I explained below, believing that Occitan’s existance is useless because there’s already French to talk to Occitan people with, who already understand it). Yes, this happens.

    • onlinely@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Why does this show lack of education over lack of interest in linguistics? I’ve studied linguistics, and I don’t categorize languages that way, but I could see how a pragmatist wouldn’t see value in learning Esperanto or Papiamento.

      • Valbrandur@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think you misunderstand what I am referring to. I am not talking about a wish to learn a language, but to consider languages as useful or useless in regards to their entire existence.

        This is unfortunately not very uncommon in people of European countries who look down upon regional languages, stating that their existence or that learning them is useless (not for them only, but for anyone) just because you can already do the task of communicating with others through the national language (per example, considering the existance of the Occitan language useless because the people of everywhere where it is spoken can already understand French). This is done by people who not understand (or even worse, who don’t care about) the value that exists in language from a cultural perspective.

          • Valbrandur@lemmygrad.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Thank you.

            I know this all sounds like Mandarin to most of the userbase of this place (which I suppose to be mainly from the US and alien to the politics of places where big regional languages exist in the same space than even larger national languages), but it’s not only the attitude of some regular people but also of some major political forces. Just a few months ago, a far-right party in Spain vowed to shut down the Academy of Valencian Language if they ever reached power (something I suppose a linguist like you would never approve), under the excuse of its existence being “a threat to national unity”.

            Nationalism: not even once.