Is this something you can see in the web interface? Or how do you know how many of the users are still active?
Is this something you can see in the web interface? Or how do you know how many of the users are still active?
Because these programs cannot themselves be concerned with truth, and because they are designed to produce text that looks truth-apt without any actual concern for truth, it seems appropriate to call their outputs bullshit.
This is actually a really nice insight on the quality of the output of current LLMs. And it teaches about how they work and what the goals given by their creators are.
They are but trained to produce factual information, but to talk about topics while sounding like a competent expert.
For LLM researchers this means that they need to figure out how to train LLMs for factuality as opposed to just sounding competent. But that is probably a lot easier said than done.
Thank you so much!
This should be pinned!
This feels unreal.
Can anyone get a higher number out of this?
More time to spread the wings if it’s higher up
That thumbnail is more like arse technica
The article says they are trying to save money, but wouldn’t exhibiting at Gamescom also work great as an advertisement?
Or are they afraid of some protests due to some things they did recently? Not that I would know what that would be, but just wondering.
Oh no! That bomb killing a family of four emitted CO2 when exploring and burnt down a totally healthy tree! Why does no one think about the environment??
“You seem to shake your phone in frustration. Please get therapy before you do the same to your baby.”
Program a video game
Colours are mostly indistinguishable. I’m not colourblind.
I didn’t read that long post, but creators cannot move to a platform that does not offer some payment for their work.
Was finden die Nazis eigentlich immer an Russland so toll?
Forgot the tilde in between
“former”
More like taste your way down