We don’t have a healthcare system in the US, we have an insurance racket.

      • hddsx@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        No, AOC cannot be president. She is currently 34 years of age

        • WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          35
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Can’t elect competent accomplished geniuses because they’re young, but can elect near-death dementia patients.

          Not saying AOC’s a genius, just that there are no qualifiers where a young person can lead the generation that will have to live with their consequences.

        • axsyse@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          2 months ago

          She was born October 13th, 1989. That means she’ll be 35 by the time of the election in November, not to mention before the inauguration in January (the date that actually matters). So, she’s definitely eligible.

          • hddsx@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            Is there precedent to support this? I am genuinely interested.

              • hddsx@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                edit-2
                2 months ago

                I was always under the impression that you had to be 35 to get on the ballot

                • LopensLeftArm@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  7
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  No he’s right actually, you just have to be 35 to be president, not to get elected president. If AOC were the nominee and she won, she would definitely be president!

                  • axsyse@lemmy.sdf.org
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    ·
                    2 months ago

                    Her birthday is in late October. She’ll barely be 35 by the point of the election in November, but she will still be 35. So, she’d be 35 both when elected, and when inaugurated. It’s a non-issue.

            • PseudorandomNoise@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              2 months ago

              The text of the constitution only mentions being 35 “to serve”. Nothing at all about that having to be true during the election.

              • axsyse@lemmy.sdf.org
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                But regardless: she’ll be 35 by the point of the election anyway so it’s a non-issue to begin with.

          • MacAttak8@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            Yikes. Such a sophomoric perspective.

            Edit: I’m not a fan of either candidate but if we were to ever have a chance of more progressive leaders then we have to vote against the regressive leaders. I’ll pinch my nose and vote for Biden so that we have a chance of presidents like AOC in the future.