The licence has been approved, the NOTAM and marine warnings published, closure announced.

Fish and Wildlife’s comments were published yesterday. I gather that the document was deleted from the original location, but as I recall, it was pretty much copied and pasted into the body of the final FAA determination WRITTEN RE-EVALUATION OF THE 2022 FINAL PROGRAMMATIC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR THE SPACEX STARSHIP/SUPER HEAVY LAUNCH VEHICLE PROGRAM AT THE BOCA CHICA LAUNCH SITE IN CAMERON COUNTY, TEXAS. I remember the bit about “Per the table above, an average summertime thunderstorm at Boca Chica would deposit more water over the landscape than any single or all combined activations of the deluge system”.

Update at https://blogs.nasa.gov/spacestation/2023/10/09/international-space-station-operations-update/

Roscosmos confirmed that the observed leak is on Nauka’s backup radiator, which is mounted to the outside of the module. The radiator was delivered to the space station on the Rassvet module during space shuttle mission STS-132 in 2010. It was transferred to the Nauka during a Roscosmos spacewalk in April. The primary radiator on Nauka is working normally, providing full cooling to the module with no impacts to the crew or to space station operations.

Teams on the ground will continue to investigate the cause of the leak, and additional updates will be made as available.

I chose the title because I thought and hoped it’s a reasonable inference.

As an example, the first time I booked my own air flight – actually, every time – I made sure it was a ticket for the days and places I want, and that I got to my home at the end.

Do you know more about this Varda licensing situation? Is it possible to get a re-entry licence before launch? If they could have, they’re incompetent not to. If not, that seems like a ridiculous regulation, requiring someone to launch with no confidence that they can legally come back (and possibly still incompetence on Varda’s part for not making sure all the conditions were going to be met).

As You999 put it, “the laws of the country that the craft is registered still applies”. I hadn’t heard the term “the Chicago Convention”. I’ve heard only “The Outer Space Treaty”, or formally Treaty on principles governing the activities of states in the exploration and use of outer space, including the moon and other celestial bodies. Specifically Article VIII:

A State Party to the Treaty on whose registry an object launched into outer space is carried shall retain jurisdiction and control over such object, and over any personnel thereof, while in outer space or on a celestial body. Ownership of objects launched into outer space, including objects landed or constructed on a celestial body, and of their component parts, is not affected by their presence in outer space or on a celestial body or by their return to the Earth. Such objects or component parts found beyond the limits of the State Party of the Treaty on whose registry they are carried shall be returned to that State Party, which shall, upon request, furnish identifying data prior to their return.

Could Varda actually land the capsule? I presume so (the whole thing is a moot point if they can’t). Would the FAA (and, for all I know, other agencies) land on them like a pile of bricks? I certainly hope so!

I posted here about the FWS environmental re-assessment due to the booster bidet.

Just wanted to point out a glamor video of Starlink deployment.

When the major problems from your first test can be illustrated by Heath Ledger in 2008 – debris zoom but boom no boom – it’s not surprising.

This is a link to my separate story post: “(Reuters) US could advance SpaceX license as soon as October after rocket exploded in April”, including a bit of interpretation.

Thank you for the pointer. Fixed.

I copied and pasted it here. Thanks to @[email protected] for pointing me back at the RES extension so I could get the source.

Each item is on its own line. C## is the ID#. If there’s text before it on its line, that’s its Observation / Description section name; if it’s at the start of the line, the Observation / Description string is the next one above.

List of Actions:

A readable text version of the 63-item list can be see on Reddit here and a reply.

Tesla Owners Silicon Valley @teslaownersSV Sep 9, 2023 · 12:17 AM UTC

Starship is the biggest rocket ever built 🤯

Elon Musk @elonmusk / Replying to @teslaownersSV Sep 9, 2023 · 6:20 AM UTC

Likely to be 10% to 20% longer in later versions

I don’t know whether to post these here or off the main page.

Jerry Pike Photo has some nice pictures on Instagram of booster return at Cape Canaveral. The rusty ASDS really gives an interesting “gritty space” feel to it. These are links to each image, but you can just click on the first and use the “>” arrow on the image to go to each in turn.

Image 1

Image 2

Image 3

Image 4

Image 5

Unrolled tweet thread at threadreaderapp.com by Ryan Hansen Space @RyanHansenSpace. It’s a look at the details of the steel plate parts and assembly under the Orbital Launch Mount.

More pour info, this time from tweets from Zack Golden @CSI_Starbase. The truck counts basically match those from @[email protected]’s post earlier.

SpaceX has received their final load of concrete for today’s Orbital Launch Mount foundation work. Here are the totals after the 15.3 hour marathon:

June 25th - 132 Truck loads

July 3rd - 171 Truck loads

Total Volume = 2,302 m^3 = 3030 yd^3

Total Weight = 5,411 Tons

For reference, a Fully loaded Starship ~ 5,000 Tons

Note: There were 4 additional trucks that showed up but were turned back around without offloading.

Shoutout to agents @VickiCocks15 and @SpmtTracker for keeping track of all these.

4:11 PM · Jul 3, 2023

and

Obviously this number is significantly greater than we predicted. For those who asked, that previous number was not considering the area in yellow, which were also completed today. This area is technically outside of the true foundation of the OLM

with a picture by RGV Aerial Photography.

Same to you, bud! I figure I’ll keep blowing on the embers. Either the flame will catch (& I get to boast “I was into Lemmy before it really took off”), or my lungs will get too tired.

So the big news of the day and night was what is believed to be the center plate of the water deluge system. It is thought that it will be placed directly under the Orbital Launch Mount.

@[email protected] already posted (at top level) “CSI Starbase video on new Deluge system”, a deep dive part 1. The URL I see for the post is https://lemmy.world/post/879748 , because that’s how I access this. The canonical one is https://lemm.ee/post/530280 .

CSI Starbase SPMT Tracker @SpmtTracker posted a tweet with a picture of what is very likely to be a vertical stand for the center plate. The image is on Imgur. The tweet is here. Ryan Hansen Space @RyanHansenSpace tweeted a rendering of how it might look under the OLM. This should be the image:

@[email protected] posted below (if sorted by new) a link to a 13-minute video by Starship Gazer, of people working in the tent on the center plate. https://lemm.ee/comment/534238 . Someone commented that, from 4 minutes on, it’s comedy gold. People were grinning around them. I’m told that someone is standing on top of the cheater pipe at one point.

NASASpaceflight posted a video of the rollout of the center. It’s about 1 hour 26 minutes long. The stand / jig was on the first truck; the center plate with some people on it was on the next truck. The clearest views are about 17 minutes on.

I also saw this in The Other Place:

[Meta] Twitter is now throwing up a nag screen to force users to log in to view content, supposedly on a temporary basis. Since a lot of the content here links to Twitter, this could be inconvenient to those without an account.

A simple solution is to link to the embedded version of the Tweet, like so. Simply type:

https://platform.twitter.com/embed/Tweet.html?id=xxx

And replace xxx with the Tweet id.

The other solution is to link to an archived version of a tweet.

(I think the last is like Internet Archive.)

What about it!? @FelixSchlang tweet from 3:03 PM - Jun 29, 2023:

It happened!!!

SpaceX opened the wall to the inventory tent and revealed one of the water deluge plates to us up close and countless other things in there!

High res pictures for supporters on all platforms coming soon!

The image alone.

In a reply, they said it looks to be upside down.

In The Other Place, u/warp99 wrote,

Looks like the segments are around 400mm thick and constructed from 40mm (38mm=1.5"?) steel plate The overall shape is a hexagon about 10m across the flats with each corner notched out.

They also speculated on how to weld the edges together: maybe put them on a stand above the final location, weld them from above and below, attach cranes and remove the stand, lower into place.

Starship Gazer (as seen on Nitter) had more pictures.