• 13 Posts
  • 748 Comments
Joined 10 months ago
cake
Cake day: August 27th, 2023

help-circle
  • It got me interested in her other work! Turns out I’ve actually seen one of her documentaries, it’s this thing about a Maori family who breed horses in the Ruakines, plays on Maori TV sometimes.

    Relevant to OP article though, found this in a review of her book:

    As she tells her story, she very clearly identifies the cause of the suffering of those involved in adoption, the archaic 1955 Adoption Act. A policy formed on an ideology that total disconnection between adopted children and their biological parents was essential.

    “In all, I had over seventy interactions with government departments. The result was always the same. Yes, they had my files. Yes, any staff member could read those files. But no, I had no right to them.”

    If that was her experience, then going forward, feeling like you were being obstructed in an OIA process would reopen a few old wounds. Especially when now here she is at uni and trying to undertake academic research.

    I think many people don’t realise these days how bad adoption in NZ was, you sort of have to hear about it from the old timers. Teenage"unmarried mothers" were taken to special facilities and when they gave birth their babies were taken, even against their will/without consent in some cases, and never allowed to know who their parents were or why they were adopted or even what their own ethnicity was.



  • My thoughts are that there are no villains here.

    a) being annoyed at being overworked is understandable. (Writing what you really think/personal opinions in an institutional email is crazy though - save it for ftf).

    b) wanting access to information for a major research project is also understandable and it’s not her fault they are overworked.

    c) she’s an ex journalist and filmmaker and her current research seems to be about the web of lies and ommissions surrounding historical closed adoptions.

    The only way anyone has ever got any traction on institutional “secrets” - everything from baby theft adoptions of the 1960s, child abuse in boarding schools in the 70s, the “Unfortunate Experiment” killing women at National Womens in the 80s, etc etc has been by being a “bitch” and pushing the authorities for information they don’t want to part with.

    OTOH as an ex journo she knows talking to the media about this will create a bit of buzz around her forthcoming research.


  • I looked it up, it’s this research here so depending on how it’s written up I can definitely see it potentially benefiting a subset of society.

    That said, the bar for PhD research is it has to make an original contribution of new material to its field - that’s for the universities to gatekeep. PhDs only have to be “of benefit to NZ” above and beyond that if they are getting direct funding from the Government (or other funding body with that requirement).

    But either way a PhD is literally a piece of research so anyone undertaking one has to, well, research all the relevant info to the very best of their ability.

    I think the issue here is whether their staff are funded to the level to meet these OIAs and if not, their manager should have requested her to apply for funding to cover it. Which is hard to know without knowing what the level of access actually was.

    There’s a wikipedia article on her and she seems to mainly be a film maker/journalist not an academic, and is now involved in adoption activism around people who weren’t allowed to know who their real parents are. So the request about her name kind of makes more sense to me in that context.





  • Diet can do it too, e.g vitamin D deficiency also causes cognitive decline, and if doctors find out someone is eating 50% butter and puts them on statins (anti cholesterol) that causes reversible cognitive decline as well.

    Bizarrely, with elderly people you also have to watch out for “silent” UTIs - they don’t hurt so the person might not realise they have one and it causes really marked signs of dementia, eg they say really dementia-ish things. Antibiotics clears it up. I saw this one first hand and it was such a relief to actually figure it out and get the person back to normal.








  • Bunch of factors:

    • cognitive decline

    • cognitive issues related to medications eg anticholinergic burden

    • belief that they no longer “understand” the way things work and have to take younger people’s word for things

    • fear due to physical vulnerability (give in to scammers to avoid getting hurt physically)

    • loneliness (give in to scammers because they think they are making a human connection)

    What we can do to help oldies is to be actively in their lives and looking out for them. Helping them navigate stuff and just letting them know we are there.