Removed by mod

i’ve seen explications before, but i’m open to the possibility that you have a novel theory that is testable, falsifiable, and valid.

Both abstaining from vot8ng and voting third party are mathematically equivalent to voting for a capitalist

no, they’re not. calling your storytelling “math” doesn’t change its veracity.

it’s a problem on .world, too, including their matrix instance.

Removed by mod

I’m a leftist and I don’t vote for capitalists or war criminals.

terrorism is a crime. you use police to deal with crimes. investigate, get a warrant, and bring them to a judge.

hero

you don’t care about anyone other than yourself.

this is a leap of logic

You see, people don’t have to answer you to still be correct.

no, but a claim made without evidence can be dismissed without evidence, and any claim made in such a way should be doubted until it is evidenced.

Removed by mod

Hamas could end hostilities today by returning all hostages and surrendering its leaders to an international court.

there is no reason to believe that. the wall would still be there. palestinians would still be subject to arrest and imprisonment without trial. they would still suffer under a blockade.

the hostilities have never ended since 1947.

you are a hero

Removed by mod

your accusation of bad faith is itself bad faith

i wrote a pretty in depth treatment of this yesterday, but i don’t like to just spam copy pasta everywhere.

you might want to ask your self “what would a critical rationalist say about my postulate?”

yea. you are just telling stories, not doing science.

I provided exactly as much support for my argument as you for yours.

wrong

yep.