![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.magnor.ovh/api/v3/image_proxy?url=https%3A%2F%2Flebowski.social%2Fpictrs%2Fimage%2F2c4dd923-c615-4b1c-b52b-f3ef2215930f.png)
4·
7 months agoGot a little Walter in our Dude.
Got a little Walter in our Dude.
Oh yeah! I see, you’re right.
And not a right triangle in sight. I forget, did Pythagoras develop Pythagorean theorem or the law of sines?
Just want to get down on my knees and start pleasing Jesus.
Yeah, I can buy that. My thought was that there is no spectrum here though. Just two points.
Yeah, I think that’s wrong. Since they are discrete and not a continuum. Since there are only two extremes.
If his new relationships were true it would make the opposite idioms consistent with their non-opposite counterparts. Kind of the same concept as a contrapositive proposition, i.e. ‘if A then B’ implies ‘if not A then not B’.
Consistency?
Edit: Funny though!
Is there a Ralphs near here?