imo, the dicey part of the matter is “what amount of the AI’s dataset is made up of actual images of children”
side account of [email protected]
imo, the dicey part of the matter is “what amount of the AI’s dataset is made up of actual images of children”
exactly what I was thinking
and on top of that what happens with a proven bad actor
would they be allowed to just jump to a new instance to harrass people?
you actually think corporations will always keep their word, don’t you
and that somehow Google acting like it does is like some fluke or one bad apple or something, rather than Google acting in ways very normal and common to corporations
tbf, that’s every social network isn’t it?
drug joke, I think