• 3 Posts
  • 8 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
Cake day: June 1st, 2023
  • The_Hunted_One@beehaw.orgMtoTabletop Gaming@beehaw.org•Give a Wish Spell to Your Low Level Party
    2·
    9 months ago

    I like the idea, and may just implement it in my game. I’m planning out a PF2e game in the near future, and a lot of the concerns of 5e’s Wish are circumvented through the wording of PF2e’s Wish:

    You state a wish, making your greatest desire come true. A wish spell can produce any one of the following effects.

    • Duplicate any spell from the arcane list of 9th level or lower to which you have access.
    • Duplicate any spell from another spell list of 7th level or lower. It must be common or you must have access.
    • Produce any effect whose power level is in line with the above effects.
    • Reverse certain effects that refer to the wish spell.

    The GM might allow you to try using wish to produce greater effects than these, but doing so might be dangerous or the spell might have only a partial effect.

    This would allow for revive spells and the like, but nothing (that I’m aware of) that could terribly break the campaign or the story.

  • The_Hunted_One@beehaw.orgMtoGaming@beehaw.org•The Steam Deck is changing how normies think of gaming PCs.
    2·
    11 months ago

    Here’s my perspective on how I’ve viewed this exchange:

    In response to your initial comment, Evergreen expressed their opinion on how people might have interpreted a comment to be more literal than it was intended. They also expressed their desire for Beehaw to try and move away from the type of dismissive “go outside and touch grass” type of argument many of us were accustomed to seeing on Reddit. They provided examples of where the use of “normies” has previously been a negative connotation, and how someone might arrive at that conclusion based on prior experience, even if it was not accurate

    From my perspective, your response to that comment boiled down to 2 points: -No one is obligated to respond -It doesn’t matter what your previous experience is, it is wrong to assume that an interaction might be playing out like previous times it played out.

    If it were worded less aggressively and more cooperatively, I believe this could have been a very constructive conversation about social expectations and assumptions.

    Evergreen then responded with a list of reasonable assumptions that we make based on previous experience.

    You responded with an insult.

    Its pretty clear with that last message, and your responses to moderators that your intent is not to have constructive conversations and make an effort to make Beehaw a better space.

    Please take some time to read the Beehaw Core Principles section: https://docs.beehaw.org/docs/core-principles/beeple-code-of-conduct/

Moderates