![](https://lemmy.magnor.ovh/api/v3/image_proxy?url=https%3A%2F%2Fsh.itjust.works%2Fpictrs%2Fimage%2Fae5668a9-e89c-40d4-a4cb-9ce355424653.png)
![](https://lemmy.magnor.ovh/api/v3/image_proxy?url=https%3A%2F%2Flemmy.world%2Fpictrs%2Fimage%2F8782d784-66d0-437a-a0df-b7c243390897.png)
5·
1 month agoAs an EV driver, I’m fine with this – the fee is cheap, and I value public charging for the convenience much more than for the cost avoidance.
As an EV driver, I’m fine with this – the fee is cheap, and I value public charging for the convenience much more than for the cost avoidance.
There may be good arguments against the project – traffic and parking, certainly – but arguing that letting the soccer team use the stadium is equivalent to selling off public land to private ownership seems like such a stretch that it undermines their whole position. They’re not getting exclusive use, and they’re helping pay for the renovation.
Pretty big limitations too: only individual filers, not joint. And only W2 or social security/railroad income, plus <1500 in interest. No itemizing deductions.
No, just thumbnails that suggest there is
Alpha claims to have produced something other than a rendering?