![](https://normalcity.life/pictrs/image/81b882ff-09c4-47e1-a2e8-e9dccd4d9628.png)
![](https://normalcity.life/pictrs/image/7d6249ab-7b4b-4083-83e4-0b33fdaee1af.png)
It’s a pretty nifty design. Is it traditional?
Someone interested in many things.
It’s a pretty nifty design. Is it traditional?
should know this already. :)
What in the gosh darn condescending non sequitur is that? I have a special kind of dislike for people who, instead of trying to promote learning for anyone and everyone at any stage, instead choose to ridicule people for having missed some trivial detail that has about as much in common with Bash as does COBOL (basically nothing). Web scripting is, unsurprisingly, its own skill, and it’s very, surpassingly, extremely, stupendously, and obviously conceivable that someone could have years of Bash experience but only recently started putting around with scripting for things like API access or HTML parsing. But you should know this already. :)
It’s fine for now. Lemmy is a bit of a ghost town on more niche topics, so I don’t see how turning away active members would make that any better. In other words, go ham.
Morton up in here spreading free salt.
I guess these guys are just plain old tools.
Patching a newer version of the Youtube app resolved the issues with playback I was having.
Not if Anna has anything to say about it…
Perhaps, but I sucked at touch typing when I was younger.
No idea; does autocorrect even exist in an inbuilt fashion on Windows? I’ve never really tried using anything like that.
Oh, and here’s a one-off test I just did without autocorrection turned on. With a few more tries, I’m sure I could get up to 100+.
Ironically, I can almost type as fast on my phone (102 WPM PB) as I can on most keyboards (110 WPM PB), and that’s with my weird improper method of touch typing. These scores are for the 15 second word test on MonkeyType.
The good ol’ Linus parrots. Squawk “Steve Burke is a bad journalist because he pointed out errors publicly that affected consumers.” Screech “Linus didn’t sell the employees internally on the idea that he and his wife were a substitute for HR, he auctioned it.”
More often than not, people who are passionate about something, such as Linux, take personal offense when someone says something incorrect or offensive about said thing. Oh, and blud is just to call someone a poser.
I love this comment so much. “You crossed Linux? Now you’ve crossed me, blud.”
I read that in GLaDOS’s voice.
To be fair, the comments and posts you leave are technically being collected for display across the lemmyverse. In that sense, there’s never going to be a zero data collection Lemmy client. Still, Liftoff currently has my vote. A decent little FOSS fork of Lemur, I believe.
I think it’s a very specific case that needs to be taken in a very narrow context; it’s essentially an innocent mistake that needs to be recognized as such. The moment you step outside of that, I see no reasonable arguments for decriminalizing anything.
I don’t really think it’s something people should do, but I can honestly see it happening to ordinary people if they aren’t thinking about what they’re doing.
Picking and choosing isn’t the game I want to play, I’m just highlighting that there are circumstances that can result in actually innocent people doing things without thinking. Pornographic content of any kind (drawings or otherwise) that depicts underage people in any context is something I think should be illegal and avoided at all costs, but I’m highlighting that there is edge-cases in everything.
I mean, perhaps in the most general sense that is technically true. For example, there have been cases about this that have come from parents taking pictures of their kids in the bathtub, even if the charges were eventually dropped. If that particular court case had gone differently, it might’ve set a very destructive precedent that served only to rip apart families.
Still, 99% of the cases that produce this material are done so in an exploitative and abusive context; definitely not arguing with that. No idea what Aaron was talking about in that particular link, but this is the one counterexample that I think of that is valid, assuming it went a different direction in court.
The traditional jumping frog is a very addicting model to fold. It works pretty well, too.