• shittymorph@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    138
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    1 year ago

    I used to work for a popular wrestling company, billionaire owner, very profitable, would write off any OSHA penalties as the ‘cost of doing business’ just as they did in 1998, when The Undertaker threw Mankind off Hell In A Cell, and plummeted 16 ft through an announcer’s table

  • rtxn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    92
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Our business-critical internal software suite was written in Pascal as a temporary solution and has been unmaintained for almost 20 years. It transmits cleartext usernames and passwords as the URI components of GET requests. They also use a single decade-old Excel file to store vital statistics. A key part of the workflow involves an Excel file with a macro that processes an HTML document from the clipboard.

    I offered them a better solution, which was rejected because the downtime and the minimal training would be more costly than working around the current issues.

  • esadatari@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    82
    ·
    1 year ago

    i worked for a hybrid hosting and cloud provider that was partnered with Electronic Arts for the SimCity reboot.

    well half way through they decided our cloud wasn’t worth it, and moved providers. but no one bothered to tell all the outsourced foreign developers that they were on a new provider architecture.

    all the shit storm fail launch of SimCity was because of extremely shitty code that was meant to work on one cloud and didn’t really work on another. but they assumed hurr hurr all server same.

    so you guys got that shit launch and i knew exactly why and couldn’t say a damn thing for YEARS

  • pureness@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    62
    ·
    1 year ago

    Geek Squad, We were flying under the radar upgrading Macbook RAM, until one day we became officially Apple Authorized to fix iPhones, which means we were no longer allowed to upgrade Macbook RAM since the Macbooks were older and considered “obsolete” by apple, meaning we were unable to repair or upgrade the hardware the customer paid for, simply because apple said it was “too old”. it was at this point in my customer interaction, that we recommend a repair shop down the road that isn’t held at gunpoint by apple ;)

    • Another Person @lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I worked at a 3rd party Apple retailer (they had a legacy contract from the 90s that only expired about 5-10 years ago) and they bought the cheapest RAM they could find to upgrade the Macs. They made hand over fist on RAM upgrades and still came in under what Apple charged for the same upgrade.

  • Boozilla@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    59
    ·
    1 year ago

    Health insurance company I worked for would automatically reject claims over a certain amount without reviewing them. Just to be dicks and make people have to resubmit. This was over 25 years ago, but it’s my understanding many health insurers still pull this shit. They don’t care if it’s legal or not. Enforcement is lazy and fines are cheaper than medical claims.

    Obviously this is in the USA.

  • thrawn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    57
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s pretty depressing, but the fact that soil and groundwater are almost certainly contaminated anywhere that humans have touched. I’ve seen all kinds of places from gas stations, to dry cleaners, to mines, to fire stations, to military bases, to schools, to hydroelectric plants, the list could go on, and every last one of them had poison in the ground.

  • Teppichbrand@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    56
    ·
    1 year ago

    Big german TV production company with succesful primetime action series used rented cars for their stunts. Different people from the team rented them with full insurance, returned them crashed. They did this until every car rent in the city stopped offering insurance without retention.

  • Impulsivedoorholder@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    58
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    DoorDash and food apps are willingly scamming restaurants, and users.

    They are perpetually in debt as they aren’t actually making money and they will likely only make very little.

    Ubers only profitable line of business was UberFrieght, then they decided to outsource it or shutter it.

    Both of these companies broke laws early on in order to operate.

    Most of you support that came from Uber in before 2019 were coming from drunk 20 something’s.

  • MrBodyMassage@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    52
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    There is a million times more counterfeit/fake items at amazon than you think, and they dont care one bit to fix the problem

  • oshu@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    The majority of tech startups are super chaotic and barely keeping things running. More than you would ever imagine.

  • Whitebrow@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    51
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    The programming team that is working hard on your project is just one dude and he smells funny. The programming team you’ve met in your introductory meeting are just the two unpaid interns that will be fired or will quit within the next two months and don’t know what’s happening. We don’t do agile despite advertising it. Also your project being a priority means it’ll be slapped together from start to finish 24 hours prior to the deadline. Oh and there will be extra charges to fix anything that doesn’t work as it should.

  • shadesdk@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    The company would bid on government contracts, knowing full well they promised features that didn’t exists and never would, but calculating that the fine for not meeting the specs was lower than the benefit of the contract and getting the buyers locked into our system. I raised this to my boss, nothing changed and I quit shortly after.

  • Ace_of_spades@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Just remembered another one:

    Have you ever had an anonymous survey sent to you by your work or by a company your work has hired? They’re not anonymous. Management knows what your opinions are and will use them against you.

    I worked for a consultant that would try and help fix businesses. The worst example I can think of was when I saw one person had answered a survey question saying that their employer had a “blame culture”. Rather than trying to work on the processes or address why something had gone wrong, staff would start pointing fingers to keep out of trouble. This didn’t fix anything and only made people spend all the time covering their posteriors.

    The manager called a general meeting of everyone at that site and then singled out the employee who’d mentioned the blame culture, blaming him for saying there was a blame culture. The employee then pointed out that they’d been told, in writing, that the survey was anonymous. That employee called the manager a liar and then she lost control of the meeting, with lots of employees calling her a liar and several storming out. They weren’t in business the next year.

  • FireRetardant@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    1-800-got-junk? doesn’t care at all about its environmental impact. No sorting what so ever happens to what goes on their trucks it all goes to landfills. All the ads will say they recycle and that they repurpose old furniture but I was threatened with being fired when I recommended donating antiques instead of dumping a load of furniture.

    More jobs and more profits comes before anything else in that company, including employee health and safety. Several times I was told to enter spaces we werent trained for (attics and crawl spaces) and carry waste I legally couldn’t transport (human/organic wastes and the laws states the driver is fined, not the company). One guy injured his shoulder during an attic job and was told to finish the shift or lose his job. Absoulte scum of a company with very sleazy management and possibly the labour board in their pocket as they kept “losing the files” when I tried to file a report with buddy’s shoulder (he was hesistant to report for fear of losing his job).

  • Flowgang@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    The biotech making your new drugs follows a less than scientific method. Lots of cherry picking of data, fudging results, etc. Part of me thinks this is part of why a lot of drugs never make it past trials. There is more incentive for individuals to come up with a drug that almost passes trials than to come up empty handed for years.

    • n33rg@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m interested to hear more. Cherry picking of data for which drugs to pursue, I had always assumed was focused on trying to push the most viable drug through to see if the benefits could outweigh the risks, costs, etc. For example, many cancer drugs come with insane side effects but they also offered the best benefits. The side effects could have disqualified the drug early in the process, but it was still worthwhile to see that there is something there that helps. My understanding is it goes like this: we found a drug that can cure cancer 40% of the time, but there’s a 50% risk of liver failure. These are fake numbers, but they likely know most of this before sending it through clinical trials, but they also know that someone literally in agony and about to die from this particular cancer would be glad to take those odds. From there, it should open up the door to more focus on the positive results as more are cured from the disease even if it causes liver failure in the select few that were about to die and took the risk.

      I’m not sure I follow your conclusion that there’s more incentive to almost pass than to have nothing? That’s generally the expectation everywhere: show you’re doing something. What leads you to say this is different in biotech and what is it harming?

      The fudging numbers part is really the most alarming, but that would only go so far. The FDAs needs to approve it, and I was under the impression that’s done independently. So if a drug company wants to waste money trialing things that won’t get approved, that’s just a loss of money to run the program and trials and would have no net gain unless they’re looking to uncover problems they can work out on a new drug.

      I don’t work in biotech, so I’m hoping you can elaborate a bit more if my trust is misplaced.