Why can’t we have federated identity to login into fediverse instead of creating login for each instance?

  • donuts@kbin.social
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    You don’t create a login for each server, you create a single account on a single server and then interact with people and posts on various servers. You don’t login to other servers because it wasn’t designed to work that way, and it isn’t necessary.

    Email is a good parallel. I make an email account on ProtonMail, and so that’s where I log in to read and write emails (to other users, potentially on other servers). I can’t use that same username and password to log into GMail, because that’s a different email service provider altogether. You certainly don’t need to make multiple email accounts if you don’t want/need to.

    • Your Huckleberry@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      So should we display full usernames by default? What’s going to happen when someone important, IRL, wants to interact with Lemmy?

      • Pyro@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        1 year ago

        In a way yes it’s similar to email need to know if your @gmail or @yahoo.

        As for “important” people, same noteworthy as any other thing. Only extra they could do is if they are with a company could have a server that is @target @mbl or @meta (though everyone might block the latter xp)

        • SQL_InjectMe@partizle.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          When you put it that way, fediverse is probably better for official companies. I suppose that’s what bluesky was doing with their protocol too