• fern@lemmy.autism.place
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      He lost half of this net worth before coming back, I think it did work until the industry let him back in and people forgot (or till the republicans picked anti-woke actors to support in Hollywood).

  • psmgx@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    169
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    3 days ago

    He was cancelled, and was out of the industry for years.

    He then kissed the ring, did the mea culpa, and got lucky making a pacifist WW2 movie. If that film tanked, or he didn’t kiss all of the asses, he’d still be out of business.

    • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      131
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      The reality is that being “cancelled” isn’t a huge deal when you’re already one of the economic elite. He didn’t even do a mea culpa, he just came back to the party and shrugged.

      • Delphia@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        28
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        Not even the economic elite, just A list of some description.

        Once your a big name you might have to take less money but someone somewhere will think you are a value proposition eventually.

      • AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        23 hours ago

        I thought my friend had tricked me into watching a romance movie up until they got on the ridge and a dude got cut in half with bullets. I was not expecting that

      • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        I disagree. Yes, the protaganist had religous motivations for his actions, but that doesn’t mean the film itself has a religous message.

  • idiomaddict@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    There’s no greater mismatch of internal and external beauty in my mind than Braveheart-era Mel Gibson. I’m straight up ashamed of how handsome I find him. The hatred did not age him well, however, which is a relief.

    • Skates@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      2 days ago

      Man I wish something I did had 10 award nominations and people still said my career crashed and burned.

      • III@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Hey, the production company who made that movie paid good money for those awards. The rich aren’t going to let something like on of their fellow rich guys being exposed as a racist stop them from getting the independent, merit based awards they paid for.

    • pantyhosewimp@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      2 days ago

      So interesting that you mentioned this film because when it was new to the rental market I watched it, and it was around this time that Mel had weird bigoted events in the news. I was indifferent and mostly ignorant of exactly what he did, and even so, I was skeptical and doubtful as well.

      However, we liked Apocalypto so much that we started rewatching it with the director’s commentary. Mel was such a fucking ass that he ruined our enjoyment of the movie. He was incredibly disrespectful of the actors in the commentary. He was not so much disparaging of them, but he effectively communicated how unimportant they were to him and how they were nothing more than disposable objects to him.

      Then I recalled those vague bad things I had heard about him in the press, and I thought, “Hmmm. Maybe this guy is a vile piece of shit.”

      On the other hand, disturbed fuckheads can make great art. There might be good reason that in the old days, artists were kept on a leash by wealthy families.

    • Leg@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 days ago

      Apocalypto is my biggest case for using death of the author to enjoy creative works. I don’t like the guy, but that movie is a must-watch.

  • Wanderer@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    Wasn’t this a time when Jews were downplaying how much influence they have in Hollywood elsewhere because of Weinstein and such?

    Seems to come and go in waves. Seems to be picking back up with the Gaza invasion.

    Where’s that news article from some Jewish guy from while back saying “people say we own Hollywood. Of course we do”. Or some shit like that.

    • TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      Seems to come and go in waves.

      Historically that’s been called pogroms.

      They Xians were doing it before Islam was even a thing. But Xians also love to kill Jewish people on their way to kill Muslims. Israel or not Xians just fucking love killing Jewish people.

      Even crazier than that folks like Shakespeare are criticized for his antisemitic Jewish character in the Merchant of Venice. Shakespeare likely never met a Jewish person as they were expelled from England during his entire life.

      • Wanderer@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        I think you are literally talking about the opposite of what I’m talking about.

    • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      I think it’s more likely that antisemitism comes and goes in waves. Right now it’s trending upwards as evidenced by you casually promoting antisemitic conspiracies and getting upvoted for it.

      And you can spare me the rationalization over how if you mention Gaza it’s not antisemitism. You’re promoting conspiracies about American Jews not Israelis here, so it is antisemitic.

      • Wanderer@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        How is that a conspiracy theory exactly?

        I’m saying people who are Jewish sometimes talk a lot about being Jewish and Jews in general and sometimes they don’t.

        When that movie came out I don’t remember people talking about how they are Jewish. Before and after that period I remember more people in the news talking about being Jewish.

        • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          23 hours ago

          The “Jews control the media” is an antisemitic conspiracy theory that’s probably at least a century old at this point.

          When faced with facts that contradict Jews controlling everything, you try to rationalize that it’s somehow the part of a Jew plot to to downplay how much influence they have.

          When you’re this dedicated to antisemitic conspiracy theories don’t act so hurt what someone calls out your antisemitism. Either accept your world view might need some adjustment or accept that you’re just gonna be an antisemite for the rest of your miserable life. If you’re gonna be a racist asshole at least be honest about it.

          • Wanderer@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            23 hours ago

            I didn’t say that. I was speaking about how vocal Jews are about being Jewish. Namely Jewish people in media not everyday people on the street.

            I was not talking about people speaking about Jews.

            What are you suggesting here. That there are no famous Jews? Or that famous Jews never talk about being Jewish? I’m confused.

  • fibojoly@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 days ago

    He got temp banned, not perma-banned, because bad words and opinions can change, apologies can be made. It’s fixable.