When you compare Biden to Trump vs. the effects on the Palestinians, were Trump president again, he would not just help the Israelis exterminate the Palestinians, but encourage them to do so quickly- as he’s already told Bibi to “finish it”. So your dichotomy is more than a bit disingenuous .

    • AmbiguousProps@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 days ago

      Vote in your local elections, and support (or directly work to pass) election reform laws, particularly related to ditching the electoral college.

      Not necessarily saying it’s the alternative, but it’s a start and local elections have larger personal impact most of the time.

      • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        5 days ago

        I agree with all of this, but it’s not an alternative, it’s just an additional vector of action. My question is about alternatives to Biden for president in this election.

        • AmbiguousProps@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          5 days ago

          Well, that’s up to the DNC. They could put almost any other prominent dem and they’d probably beat Trump. The DNC also has the ability to change the candidate after the election but before the electoral ballots are cast, at least as far as I understand their rules.

          Trust, I understand your point. The primaries are over, and that’s where the different candidate should have been chosen. But unfortunately, the whole not knowing any viable alternatives line of thinking is what got the DNC into this mess in the first place.

          • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            5 days ago

            Yeah, I think any other Dem candidate is a gamble: you lose out on the significant incumbent boost, you only have 4 months to campaign if you start now, and you risk losing momentum on the moderate vote. This isn’t an election I want to gamble with, especially with the recent SCOTUS ruling. Everything said and done, I don’t think the benefits outweigh the risks.

            November 6th is when we should start pushing for significant changes. 11th hour fuckery isn’t going to help this cycle.

            • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              4 days ago

              Yeah, I think any other Dem candidate is a gamble: you lose out on the significant incumbent boost

              Except Biden has a 37% approval rating…

              That’s Jimmy Carter level…

              Do you know what happened with Jimmy Carter’s second term?

              An incumbency only translates to a boost, when being the incumbent is a positive thing.

              2/3s of voters don’t think Biden is a good president. 56% think he is a bad one.

              We can’t afford to hope enough people hold their nose for him.

              This is bigger than any one person, even Joe Biden

      • JimSamtanko@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        5 days ago

        But all the people whining about gEnOciDe jOe are only upset because its and election year. They disappear after November and don’t show up again until 4 years later.

        • Adub@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 days ago

          Trump used Palestinian as a slur & they are laughing with him. Not sure how serious anyone is supposed to take them.

          • JimSamtanko@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 days ago

            Well, they’re serious about urging people to not vote against MAGA, so…. There’s that.

      • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        5 days ago

        I’m all for socialism long term solution. I’m confused as to how that is an alternative to voting against the present greatest threat to socialism that can be voted against. What is the material implementation of “socialism” which provides a timely alternative to that action?

        • umbrella@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          5 days ago

          op commenter was talking about a long term solution.

          socialism begins with the organization of the working class. this organization can be used to press your boss and the government in an effective way in the short term.

          this ‘pressure’ can look like a strike, but its not limited to it.

          • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            5 days ago

            Again, actions I support. These actions, however, are not mutually exclusive to voting in elections for the lesser evil. In fact, these actions are more substantially suppressed under the greater evil. The rational action then is to use all avenues available to oneself, including but not limited to voting for whichever of the two dominant parties is less detrimental to action on other avenues.

            One of the two dominant parties is objectively worse for the organization of the working class. Vote for the less worse party, while you organize and pressure the powers that be.

            • umbrella@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              4 days ago

              are not mutually exclusive to voting in elections for the lesser evil

              I agree with that. This case though, presents two very evil options. You guys have been legalizing child labour again, building a theocracy and doing an ethnic cleansing in the middle east under the supposed lesser evil. They are accelerating fascism regardless of who wins, vote if you will but other avenues must be pursued if you are to keep your thin veil of civility.

              • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                4 days ago

                Who is “you guys”? What point are you trying to make with this both-sides stuff? Child labor and theocracy are exclusively being pushed by the Republicans, no Democrats are doing that. Even in the middle east, Democrats are tiptoeing through a nasty web of geopolitics, while it’s the Republicans who want to glass Palestine. Neo-Libs have a lot of problems, but it’s simply deranged to imply they’re anywhere near as evil as MAGA.

                • umbrella@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  4 days ago

                  geopolitics is no excuse for the things being perpetrated inside but especially outside the us, currently by democrats. if the us made a bad judgment and found itself losing the situation, financing a literal genocide to avoid losing is not a justifiable thing to do here.

                  • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    4 days ago

                    It seems like you’re deliberately diverting away from my point: both sides are bad, but one is orders of magnitude worse than the other. Quashing voter turnout with this doomer rhetoric helps the worse one win. Democrats having problems doesn’t stop Republican problems from being an existential threat to the future of our democracy, and any chance of leftward progress. You do realize this, right?