• Jake Farm@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    24
    ·
    2 days ago

    Sex is immutable, you are aware that sex is more than the appearance of sex organs right?

    • MindTraveller@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Sex is a combination of genetic, hormonal, anatomical, skeletal, dermal, muscular, trichoic, and arguably neurological factors. Most of those things are to some degree malleable, and in any case their grouping under the construct “sex” is social. Sex IS a social construct. It was not written on the bones of the universe in permanent marker that there would be males and females. Sex is a correlation that humans noticed, connected, and gave a name to.

      Perhaps you are instead thinking of genotype. Which yes, is largely immutable barring retroviruses and new technologies, but trans people have conclusively proven that genotype is not the same as phenotype.

      By the way, biohackers have already started using CRISPR on themselves for fun.

    • SkyezOpen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      It’s funny how you understand sex is more than genitals then claim it’s set in stone. It’s like 8 different things and we can change most of them.

      • Jake Farm@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        2 days ago

        I am referring to all the other physiological factors. The appearance of an organ and the actual function are two different things, carving a heart to look externally like a kidney does not make it a kidney.