• MigratingApe@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    10 months ago

    (What’s with the downvotes?)

    Small scale reactors that require almost no maintenance and produce enough power for a single city are the hot topic right now due to what you just mentioned. As a side product, they provide hot water for the city.

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      (What’s with the downvotes?)

      Lots of people know virtually nothing about nuclear even tho they’re avid supporters of it. So when you point out a downside, they get mad.

      As a side product, they provide hot water for the city.

      Hot water (technically superheated steam) is the main (and only immediate) product of a nuclear reactor…

      Trying to directly use secondary coolant as hot water just makes zero sense though. It’s waaaaay more efficient to move the electricity and then heat different water.

      I mean, you’re talking about an open loop nuclear system…

      No sane engineer would ever do that. A small primary loop leak and your dosing everyone, all to just essentially lose efficiency.

      Where did you even see that suggested?

    • gibmiser@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      Imagine living in a snowy city where hot water is pumped through the sidewalks to people’s homes. No frozen pipes, no shoveling snow. No people freezing to death…