I was just wondering how the US (or any country really) can pull out 100 billion on a given occasion ? Is the treasury just “printing” more money, or are taxes raised? (let’s say 200million Americans are active, that’s still $500 per person) . Or is it just debt passed on to future generations? It goes without saying that I am not fluent in finance

  • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 months ago

    Will that make up for the cost? Probably not […]

    I think you’re being a bit too conservative here, especially with your finishing point about direct US involvement there is a compelling argument that 60B today would quite a steal if it avoided the cost of waging a direct war against Russia in military expenses alone. If we start considering lost productivity due to a draft and especially economic damage on US soil and especially especially the damage if nukes were involved… then it’s hugely profitable. All that, of course, depends on the likelihood of direct conflict.

    In addition, Ukraine is a valuable economic partner and investing in their future stability might also be a fair justification.

    The TL;DR is that I don’t really disagree with anything you said but I think you’re under valuing how good of an RoI this grant is.

    • BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      You could be right, it really depends on what you assume it’s buying. I was more referring to the direct economic stimulation paying itself off.

      • Jimmyeatsausage@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 months ago

        I mean, 60B isn’t an outrageous amount for just the grain. 5% of the world’s grain comes from Ukraine, and Russia already has a rich history of using their resource exports to extort Western governments.