The EU says X is the worst platform for disinformation | Just as it removes a way to report election misinformation::undefined

  • reddig33@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    113
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    The election misinformation seems to be the point. Why else would someone bankroll Twitter/X?

    • Granbo's Holy Hotrod@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      This has been my thought the whole time. In general, just to put down the effective communication of the masses in real time, that is scary to a certain small group of people.

  • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    70
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    9 months ago

    EU should block X. See how Lonnie responds to that.

    Future headline: Lonboy threatens to sue EU

  • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    “Remember, Free Speech is when I, and only I, can say whatever the hell I want!” - Elon Musk

    How is twitter still standing? Mastodon is the way of the future

    • seitanic@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      I sometimes wonder how much it would take to get people to leave X en masse. Maybe if Elon was posting Nazi propaganda?

      • Kage520@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        9 months ago

        Nope. I sent this article to my trumper friend and he said “yeah the eu is a horribly corrupt organization”. If Elon promoted Nazi propaganda they would be excited and embrace that too.

        Maybe if something else big came along and everyone was like “you’re still using Xitter? Lol okay boomer” they might consider moving over. Maybe.

      • nik0@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        9 months ago

        Not even. Remember he was funding people like Andrew Tate thousands of dollars. Nothing is gonna get these people out unless they get charged to use twitter

        • SnipingNinja@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          A lot of people don’t think Andrew Tate is wrong so I don’t think that’s a great argument (or at least that’s what appears to be on places like insta, etc)

      • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        9 months ago

        Honestly I’m surprised it didn’t become a ghost town like Tumblr did after they banned porn.

      • Asudox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Lots of them surely will migrate to Mastodon when Elon releases that fee bs. Honestly, we should thank Elon for that. Thanks to him, Mastodon will become mainstream soon.

        • clearleaf@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          If lemmy didn’t take over the world after the Reddit schism then I don’t think twitter will ever die either. Twitter users have been given every reason to leave yet there’s already lots of people paying money to the person they hate the most in the world just to use it. And most of those people aren’t really people anymore, they’re twitter users on every level of their being. It would be like a blobfish out of water.

  • dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    9 months ago

    It already was prior to Musk’s takeover.

    It’s just always been a cesspool. A complete waste of human energy and time. And it never once turned a profit. An abject failure by every metric.

    • CosmoNova@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      It already was prior to Musk’s takeover.

      It’s crazy how media pretends Twitter wasn’t the biggest contributor to Trump’s MAGA movement, being the most followed user on the site up until his fanatic followers stormed the US capitol. I mean did people already forget these dreadful years of “Trump tweeted” headlines every single day??? Twitter has been an enemy to democracy for many years.

      • SMT42@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        I don’t know how you can say that was anti-democratic, though.
        That level of open and direct communication from the sitting president is very democratic. Say what you will about the content of that communication, but Twitter did not act undemocratically by allowing the president to speak freely…

    • NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      9 months ago

      And it never once turned a profit.

      Not true.

      Twitter was profitable at the time when that Elon guy bought it (and before, and some time after).

  • SouthEndSunset@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    We watching how daft Elon is in real time, and his fan boys and girls are still trying to tell us he’s smart…

  • DeadNinja@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    …worst platform for disinformation…

    Is that a double negative, or am I hallucinating ?

  • Myro@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    9 months ago

    Musk probably sees this as a confirmation it’s working as intended.

  • RobotToaster@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    9 months ago

    When did we collectively decide techbro billionaires should be the arbiter of what is and isn’t disinformation?

    • Pxtl@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      9 months ago

      When we decided that freedom of speech was a core freedom, and the wealthiest people own the biggest megaphones. Musk’s Twitter is just a reflection of the same system that protects the Murdochs, Chatham Asset Management, etc. The bar for “this speech is illegal” is extremely high in most first-world countries, at least unless your disinformation can be shown to harm important corporations (fraud) or rich people with really really good lawyers (defamation) or the justice system itself (perjury, filing false reports), it’s basically impossible to fight. This weakness of the justice system was why everybody was happy to see amoral corporations like Twitter taking up the project pre-Musk.

      Remember, the only people who managed to extract consequences for The Big Lie from the above organizations is Dominion Voting Systems, a huge corporation that could show damages.

      As long as the facts of our shared reality are considered beneath protection unless they coincide with the financial interests of VIPs, shitty people with big megaphones will lie with impunity.

    • Natanael@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      9 months ago

      When we decided to gather in their websites in large masses and ignore our common sense

    • beebarfbadger@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      Well, we gave the people with the money the power to decide everything else that’s important so why not that too?

  • TheSaneWriter@lemmy.thesanewriter.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    9 months ago

    This is completely unsurprising. Under the new “free speech” regime, X has been completely deluged with antisemitic, pro-Russia, and anti-democracy propaganda. It’s no wonder that advertisers don’t want to be associated with that type of content.

    • Kind@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      “Goebbels was in favor of free speech for views he liked. So was Stalin. If you’re really in favor of free speech, then you’re in favor of freedom of speech for precisely the views you despise. Otherwise, you’re not in favor of free speech” Noam Chomsky

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    9 months ago

    Just imagine one could complain about the last remaining posts of this dying platform!

  • thatsTheCatch@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Surely it can’t be worse than Truth Social or Rumble… I’m assuming they mean mainstream platforms