• miridius@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Most software is a terrible pile of unreadable code with no tests and horrible architecture choices, that somehow manages to keep working just through the power of years of customers finding bugs and complaining loud enough to get them fixed.

    If you write any automated tests at all, you’re already better than most “professional” software companies. If you have a CI/CD pipeline, you’re far ahead.

  • CurlyWurlies4All@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    168
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    The cost of digital advertising cannot be justified by its effectiveness (or rather lack there of). We’ve collectively spent hundreds of billions of dollars creating the infrastructure for invasive hyper targeted ads that do not get better results than simple billboards and terrestrial TV ads even now. We’ve created a global economy of marketing, media, advertising and sales solely reliant on technofeudalist overlords who’ve provided very little actual improvement of anything.

  • rodbiren@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    78
    ·
    5 days ago

    A whole bunch of welds in nuclear reactors are visually inspected using cameras duct taped onto the end of incredibly long poles which also get duct taped together. This would be the inside of BWR plants near the fuel and jet pumps. There is also an “art” to moving the cameras and poles around to get the shots you need. And if you get stuck the talented people know how to get you unstuck. There are also cameras just duct taped to ropes that the camera handler “swims” to certain spots.

    Don’t get me wrong, we have cool ultrasonic inspecting robots as well, but I was absolutely blown away by what visual inspection looked like in practice.

    PS: The high dose fields make the camera look like it is being blasted with colorful confetti because of the high energy particles bombarding the camera module.

  • SirSamuel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    94
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    These aren’t secrets, but may not be well known (unless you watch LPL):

    Sentry Safes aren’t safes, they are fire boxes with a fancy lock.

    High security locks are not high security because of the lock design, but because the keys are very difficult to have duplicated.

    No one (except maybe intelligence agencies) breaks in to a house by picking a lock, especially in the US. Windows, weak door frames, and, in a pinch, making a hole in the wall are all faster ways of getting in.

    Car keys are so expensive because many manufacturers charge a subscription or per-use fee to access and program the keys to the ignition. These costs are passed on to consumers

    No one is picking your locks just to move things around or steal small, insignificant items. You are either suffering from a mental disorder or a trusted member of the household is gaslighting you (it’s not gaslighting though, you’re your grasp of reality is slipping. Don’t call me for a pick proof lock, just get help please)

    Some manufacturers (you know, in China) will put any sticker you want on the products they produce, including UL and ANSI stickers. Before buying a product that is supposedly fire-rated, such as a fire safe, check the UL website to verify the item is actually listed with them.

    “Grade 1” door hardware sold in stores like Lowe’s or Home Depot is, at best, Grade 2, and is likely Grade 3 (residential grade). These grades are really just about how durable the product is over time, and how much abuse they will endure by the public.

    And just a little practical advice. Find a qualified, honest locksmith before you need one. We’re like plumbers. If you wait until you have an emergency to find one, the quality will be questionable. There are a lot of scammers out there. If you don’t have a resource for locksmiths beyond Google, look on the ALOA website for members in your area. The good ones will know who the other good ones are, and won’t be shy about sharing that info if they are unavailable or too far away

  • 3volver@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    4 days ago

    Fractional-reserve banking. Most people have no idea what it is, probably a good thing. You could argue that it’s not a “secret”, but most people aren’t aware of it regardless. I don’t think most people would be fond of grinding for $15 an hour if they knew banks could just lend money they don’t actually have. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fractional-reserve_banking

  • stufkes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    153
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 days ago

    The use of chatgpt for writing is so widespread in higher ed, it will cause serious problems to those students when entering the workforce.

    Lots of fancy stuff is written about how we just have to change the way we teach!, and how we can use chatgpt in lessons! blablabla, but it’s all ignorant of the fact that some things need to be learnt by doing them, and students can’t understand how they hurt their own learning, because they don’t know what they don’t know.

  • HexesofVexes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    82
    ·
    5 days ago

    In the UK, slot machines fall into 4 main categories. Of particular interest are category C machines, as these can remember a fixed number of previous games. I.e. the “myth” that a machine is “about to pay out” because “someone lost a lot to it” can hold for these games.

    Cat A and B machines are completely random, previous games can have no impact on probabilities of winning (though pots can climb).

    Online games have different rules, not always fair ones!

    Oh, and ALL games (in a physical location) must (by law) show “RTP” (return to player) somewhere. It usually gets stuck it in a block of text in the manual since no-one reads them. (If it’s below 97.3% just go play roulette as it offers better returns).

  • CaptnNMorgan@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    4 days ago

    Dog groomers get almost zero legal repercussions for mistreating dogs. It has to be undeniable that the groomer injured the dog on purpose before anything really happens. That’s why it’s SO important to trust the person grooming your dog if they’re the type of breed that needs it.

  • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    4 days ago

    the oh so well kept secret of the software and services (surrounding it) industry that people seem to think is worth paying money for.

    Yet time after time these paid software companies produce the most vile awful, dysfunctional, and garbage software (and services) that have ever been created. While somehow a group of people who aren’t being paid, and aren’t doing this for any sort of reason other than “why not” manage to create the most functional software ever, while also managing to somehow catch the single biggest potential software vulnerability in this decade (other than wannacry) purely because ssh has slightly sus behaviors when running the infected payload.

    Please stop doing web dev, it isn’t real.

  • philpo@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    Emergency Medical Service/Ambulances are a ridiculously low qualified in a fair shair of industrial nations, especially the US,France, or Austria.

    Even in the countries with more training/physician based services (Germany, Belgium, Italy)the actual qualification of the responders varies widely - most of them wouldn’t be allowed to care for a single emergency within a hospital on their own.

  • sudo42@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    267
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    If you value your privacy and you have a choice between using a browser to access a service vs installing their app, use the browser.

    Online services can get much more information about you through an app vs the browser. Browsers are generally locked down more. Apps in general have access to much more information from your device.

  • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    145
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    The world is littered with fake empty buildings used to obscure phone line junctions and internet provider stuff.

    Almost every neighbourhood has one. But they look like normal houses, so you can never tell unless you know where to look for.

  • nik9000@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    4 days ago

    We knew spooks were all up in the phone network. They’d show up and ask installers to run them some cables and configure ports in a certain way. I was friends with folks who were friends with the installers.

  • slazer2au@lemmy.world
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    276
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    6 days ago

    The majority of technologies that power the internet were developed in the 80s and refined in the 90s. Everything since then is built as a layer of abstraction on top of those core technologies.

    • mspencer712@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      103
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      Also, the development and evolution of these open technologies relies on human interest and attention, and that attention can be diminished, even starved, by free, closed offerings.

      Evil plan step 1: make a free closed alternative and make it better than everything else. Discord for chat, Facebook for forums and chat/email, etc.

      Step 2: wait a few years, or a decade or more. The world will largely forget how to use the open alternatives. Instant messengers, forums, chat services, just give them a decade to die out. Privately hosted communities, either move to Facebook, pay for commercial anti-spam support, spend massive volunteer hours, or drown in spam.

      Step 3: monetize your now-captive audience. What else are they going to use? Tools and apps from the 2000s?

      • forgotmylastusername@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        56
        ·
        6 days ago

        We are facing a very real possibility of the end of the web browser as we know it. Google owns the chromium engine. Mozilla is on ever more precarious footing. It’s become logistically impossible to build competing products except for tech giant. Even then everybody else gave up and went with chromium.

        • errer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          22
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 days ago

          And Mozilla is largely funded by Google. We all just hope they don’t pull the rug from them but I have no faith that our inept, slow government would stop that from happening before it’s too late.

          • Liz@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            30
            ·
            5 days ago

            Almost certainly the entire reason Google is funding Mozilla is to try and stave off antitrust lawsuits.

            • Iron Lynx@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              12
              ·
              5 days ago

              The official reason is so that Big G is the default search engine on every install.

              But that may very well just be a smokescreen.

            • 50MYT@aussie.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              5 days ago

              Yep.

              Google will spend more on a legal team working out how to prevent the lawsuits in the first place than they would be giving to Mozilla

            • Waffelson@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 days ago

              I think this reason is stupid. Why can’t there be a duopoly in the browser market like in the phone market? Even if there is no firefox, there will still be safari on its own engine

              • Liz@midwest.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                4 days ago

                I think the phone market should also be broken up.

                The reason a doupoly is bad in any market is that it’s essentially next to no choice for the consumer, and the businesses can force changes to the market that are anti-consumer with little reprocussion. In any given market the minimum number of legitimate competitors necessary for meaningful competition will be different, but even three is too few in the web browser game, especially when the market shares look like this.

      • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        6 days ago

        But nntpd is still out there. Rebuilding Usenet will suck. But it’s not impossible. Start from the net2 sites again.

        Old mail RFCs included an instant message channel. I’m sure I saw code in either sendmail or uw-imap for it too.

        I like the fediverse, but the old ways are still valid for their particular payload.

    • 3volver@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      4 days ago

      The key word is “majority”. I think IPFS will gain more popularity moving forward especially if fascism and censorship continue to rise.

      • Mike1576218@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 days ago

        And IPFS is not build on 90s tech?

        Also compared to TOR, IPFS has 0 censorship resiliance.

        I was a bit exmited for IPFS for a moment, but th more i tried it and thought about it, the less I saw a reason to use it.

    • SurpriZe@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      An example of the flip side? Something built on the newest technology from the bottom up?